Overcoming the Four Rs: Recommendations Overcoming problems of reaction, repetition, results, and raising funds requires the following. The first is strong leadership to articulate ashort-andmedium-termvision ,galvanizing support for such a vision both inside and outsidean institution, and diversifying the funding base of that organization. Such diversification of funding cannot, however, contradict the strategic vision of the institution or the leadership. Strong leadership requires the building of coalitions within the broad and expansive global health community and relying less on donors to outline policy objectives. Hence those articulating global health policy must be separate to those who fund health policy. This is not easily achieved, as donor soften want to know where their money is going, and private philanthropists seek to
invest in those causes they deem to be the most worthwhile. Actors should play to their strengths and assert their experience, expertise, and legitimacy. Global policy-making needs to be less driven by global finance for health. Money is intrinsic for the delivery of drugs, education campaigns, medical supplies, construction of health centres, health worker training, and a whole host of issues. However, the need to generate, maintain, and increase funds should exist separately to policy-making, otherwise policy-making is more reactionary and less visionary and strategic. Second, key principles of public health – the right to health, distributive justice, question so fequality inaccess to healthcare,and how different people experience good or bad health–mustbere-engagedwithasamatterofpolicypractice(seeChapters4,10,12,25, and 28). Results-based frameworks and the need for a return on investment should not exclude such commitments and principles. One way of reintroducing these themes is to bring the public back into discussions on global health and making the private – including philanthropic organizations – subject to the same accountability and transparency structures as public bodies, whether governmental or intergovernmental. Whilst private actors may not be spending taxpayers’ money, they have considerable influence on the health of the world’s population. The plurality of actors and ideas is a unique and positive component of global health, yet such plurality needs to translate to decision- and policy-making and be held to account. Third, global health policy must be designed in-country, by the government, as the elected government through public engagement and discussion sees fit.Global institutions suchastheWorldBankandtheGlobalFundshouldprovidesupportthroughfinanceand assuchcanmakerecommendations,butsuchrecommendationsshouldnotformthebasis of conditional lending. Country-based agendas will make health strategies more context specific, will reduce the burden on state-based health agencies that often have to juggle competing donor demands, and will avoid repetition in the formation of health policy. Focusing on country-based strategies will invert current structures of policy-making so that implementers of policy at the local level become the policy formulators and those who currently make policy at the global level concentrate on working with countries on effective implementation.
Assignments:
look at the Systems Model on the policy process, Figure 1.3 (Problem Identification, Policy Formulation, Policy Implementation, Policy Evaluation)
Write a paper with the purpose of overcoming the problems described by the four Rs (Reaction, Repetition, Results, and Raising Funds) listed above
Assume the role of the leader who will be building a coalition by creating a policy vision for the internal and external stakeholders of your geographical area or country. First, begin by identifying the deficiencies in a global policy that you have researched so that you can establish a policy vision by determining the needed funding for the services you feel must be provided and including that in the policy.
Explain how your policy would benefit your target population. Include the following headings/sections in your submission:
· Introduction—Describe the population affected by the policy
· Deficiencies of—Name of Global Policy
· Vision of Changes—Needed what needs to change to make the policy better
· Gaining Support for the Vision—Internal and external
· Needed Funding—Where will funding come from for services discussed in the policy
· Conclusions
· References
Your paper should meet the following requirements:
· Be 3-4 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages.
· Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but four must be external.
· Be formatted according to APA writing guidelines.
· Remember to utilize headings to organize the content in your work.

· No pliagiarism

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Case Study – Career Intervention Plan: Part II

Note that this section of the written assignment pertains to the Week 6 Written Assignment Case Study. The feedback you receive will assist you in completing your final Case Study.
Your client, Julie Brown, is seeking career counseling to help her decide what direction to take in her career. She was recently laid off from a full-time position as a counseling assistant at a local community college. As part of her responsibilities in that job, Julie worked at the front desk of the counseling center. She was the first contact to students, answering basic questions and signing students in to see counselors. She conveyed to you that she absolutely loved her job. Prior to working as a counseling assistant, she worked part time as a test proctor, while earning her Bachelors of Arts degree in Psychology from Fresno State University. Julie visited the career center while in college. Her Keirsey temperament type is Idealist. Her Holland code is Social. Her Myers-Briggs Typology Indicator is Extraverted, Intuitive, Feeling, and Perceiving (ENFP). Julie has indicated that she wants to consider three career paths before making a final decision. She is open to working full time and attending school at night or working part time while attending school full time. While she prefers personal interactions to virtual communication, she has indicated that online schooling is an option.
Utilizing the Week Six Written Assignment Case Study and your Week Two Written Assignment on Julie’s Keirsey temperament sorter and Holland’s code results, discuss the short-term intervention plan (less than one year) that you will develop to meet Julie’s needs and preferences regarding career opportunities. Discuss how Julie’s past employment experiences, interests, and personality results from the assessments administered support or align with the short-term plan you have developed. What types of educational options, career trainings, and/or career preparation will be explored in the short term so that Julie can meet her long-term career goals?
Your paper should be a minimum of 700 words (2 pages), not including the title or references pages.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Coaching and Consultation Models Recognizing the many characteristics and roles of career counseling is beneficial in informing you as to the value and expertise each offers clients. As you review Chapter 10, keep in mind how the traditional consultation model has given rise to a variety of modalities that focus on specific roles in the consultation process. To prepare for this Discussion:
· Review this week’s Learning Resources.
· Compare and contrast the models and goals of coaching and consulting as they apply to vocational psychology. Think about the following questions:
. what are the challenges or dilemmas associated with each model?
. What are the benefits of each model?
. Which aspects of the models most appeal to you? Does one model resonate with your more than the other? If so, why?
. How could your work with clients be informed by one of both of these models?.
Question Post by Day 4 a comparison between coaching and consulting, a summary of key insights gained about the use of the coaching and consulting models, and how you could utilize these approaches in your work with clients.INTERNATIONAL COACHING FEDERATION CODE OF ETHICS
Section 1: Definitions
•Coaching: Coaching is partnering with clients in a thought-provoking and creative process that inspires them to maximize their personal and professional potential.
•A professional coaching relationship: A professional coaching relationship exists when coaching includes a business agreement or contract that defines the responsibilities of each party.
 
•An ICF Professional Coach: An ICF Professional Coach also agrees to practice the ICF Professional Core Competencies and pledges accountability to the ICF Code of Ethics.
 
In order to clarify roles in the coaching relationship, it is often necessary to distinguish between the client and the sponsor. In most cases, the client and sponsor are the same person and therefore jointly referred to as the client. For purposes of identification, however, the International Coach Federation defines these roles as follows:
 
•Client: The “client” is the person(s) being coached.
 
•Sponsor: The “sponsor” is the entity (including its representatives) paying for and/or arranging for coaching services to be provided.
 
In all cases, coaching engagement contracts or agreements should clearly establish the rights, roles, and responsibilities for both the client and sponsor if they are not the same persons.
 
Part Two: The ICF Standards of Ethical Conduct
 
Preamble: ICF Professional Coaches aspire to conduct themselves in a manner that reflects positively upon the coaching profession; are respectful of different approaches to coaching; and recognize that they are also bound by applicable laws and regulations.
Section 1: Professional Conduct At Large
As a coach:
1) I will not knowingly make any public statement that is untrue or misleading about what I offer as a coach, or make false claims in any written documents relating to the coaching profession or my credentials or the ICF
2) I will accurately identify my coaching qualifications, expertise, experience, certifications and ICF Credentials.
3) I will recognize and honor the efforts and contributions of others and not misrepresent them as my own. I understand that violating this standard may leave me subject to legal remedy by a third party.
4) I will, at all times, strive to recognize personal issues that may impair, conflict, or interfere with my coaching performance or my professional coaching relationships. Whenever the facts and circumstances necessitate, I will promptly seek professional assistance and determine the action to be taken, including whether it is appropriate to suspend or terminate my coaching relationship(s).
5) I will conduct myself in accordance with the ICF Code of Ethics in all coach training, coach mentoring, and coach supervisory activities.
6) I will conduct and report research with competence, honesty, and within recognized scientific standards and applicable subject guidelines. My research will be carried out with the necessary consent and approval of those involved, and with an approach that will protect participants from any potential harm. All research efforts will be performed in a manner that complies with all the applicable laws of the country in which the research is conducted.
7) I will maintain, store, and dispose of any records created during my coaching business in a manner that promotes confidentiality, security, and privacy, and complies with any applicable laws and agreements
8) I will use ICF member contact information (e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, etc.) only in the manner and to the extent authorized by the ICF.
Section 2: Conflicts of Interest
As a coach:
9) I will seek to avoid conflicts of interest and potential conflicts of interest and openly disclose any such conflicts. I will offer to remove myself when such a conflict arises.
10) I will disclose to my client and his or her sponsor all anticipated compensation from third parties that I may pay or receive for referrals of that client.
11) I will only barter for services, goods or other non-monetary remuneration when it will not impair the coaching relationship.
12) I will not knowingly take any personal, professional, or monetary advantage or benefit of the coach-client relationship, except by a form of compensation as agreed in the agreement or contract.
 
Section 3: Professional Conduct with Clients
 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

evolution of learning theories

Write a 5–7-page analysis on a featured debate on learning theory. You will explore how the evolution of learning theories and neuroscience has shaped a current learning controversy.
Learning theories evolve over time. It is important to understand how historical, political, and cultural changes affect learning theories and how we apply them. The purpose of analyzing a current learning theory debate allows you to demonstrate your knowledge of theories, critical thinking skills, and how to apply theory to your own specialized field of psychology.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

• Competency 1: Evaluate the strengths, limitations, and applications of the foundational learning theories.
  • Explain how the evolution of learning theories and neuroscience over time has shaped a selected learning controversy.
  • Evaluate multiple perspectives on the selected learning controversy.
• Competency 3: Apply evidence based research in learning theories to guide decision making and problem solving.
  • Assess the implications of this learning controversy on your area of specialization.
• Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.
  • Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics; format paper, citations, and references using APA style. I will upload instructions and grading score guide in the morning.

Preparation

Learning theories evolve over time. As we discover more about how people learn, the application of learning theories also changes. An idea that worked 50, 20, or even 5 years ago might not work currently due to a shift in cultural beliefs, new knowledge, or new learning contexts. Anytime there is a change in our thinking it can impact the way we apply learning theories. Many times differing perspectives can lead to productive discussions and academic debates that further the evolution of the learning theory.

Instructions

In this assessment, you will explore how the evolution of learning theories and neuroscience has shaped a current learning controversy.
Select one of the following learning controversies:

• Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory.
• Learning Styles.
• Brain Hemisphere Dominance (Left verses Right Brain).

Research the historical approaches for the learning controversy and how this issue is currently being debated.

• Looking at this learning controversy through the lens of learning theories and neuroscience, what has changed or been discovered that has led to this debate?
• Analyze the multiple perspectives of the selected learning controversy.
• What are the arguments and priorities for this issue?
• Assess the impact of the selected learning controversy on your area of specialization.

Make sure to include the following:

• Explain how the evolution of learning theories and neuroscience over time has shaped selected learning controversy.
• Evaluate multiple perspectives to the selected learning controversy.
  • What are arguments and priorities of the proponents and critics of this issue?
• Assess the implications of this learning controversy on your area of specialization.

Additional Requirements

• Length: 5–7 pages (not counting your title page or references), double-spaced, 12-point font.
• Number of references: Minimum of 5 references.
• Article distinctions: There are three different types of articles. Research articles present original research, review articles discuss research already presented elsewhere, and survey articles are comprehensive review articles that discuss an entire field or area of research. References to books are acceptable, but they should be kept to a minimum—probably no more than five.
• APA style: You must use proper APA style to cite and list your references. Refer to the Writing Center’s APA Style and Format guidelines (linked in the Suggested Resources) for more information.
• Format: Use the following structure:
  • Cover page (your name, your specialization or program, title and course number, current quarter and year, and instructor’s name).
  • Abstract (optional).
  • Body of paper, including headings and subheadings over the appropriate content.
  • Reference list.
  • Refer to the APA Style and Format guidelines for additional formatting information.
• Style: Write in the third person as an impartial narrator. Avoid the use of I, we, or you. In particular, avoid phrases like “I think” in favor of phrases like “the evidence suggests” or “research indicates.” In science, personal opinion carries no weight unless supported by a combination of empirical research and statistical or logical-mathematical inference.
• Other notes: Avoid long quoted passages from your source texts. Your writing should be a synthesis of your own ideas, in your own words—even if your ideas refer to the original ideas of others, in which case the references should be explicit. Graduate-level writing should be scholarly and more than a mere summary. It should present a unique thesis or at least a significant point you are trying to make, adding appreciably to what is already known of your topic. Your point or thesis will stand or fall solely on its strength—that is, the quality and quantity of the evidence you present.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.