na

thanks

Great paper

EXCELLENT paper

Great paper

Great paper

Thank you so much I will be using you in the near future

Great paper. I just got nervous about the time. Thank you

GREAT paper

GREAT paper

Excellent paper

Great paper

Received a 65% this paper was very disappointing. Not at all the service i ever receive or expected.

Excellent paper

I made a C from this paper. Instructor notes are as follows: good points on the positive aspects of the data and recognition of issues with wait times after the patients\' evaluation. Are there trends? Seems like once the patient has been seen and evaluated, stabilized if you will, then things slow down. Some of your statements are contradictory, however, may have a grammar issue? Feedback: Good points on the use of technology, but how do you know that it is a practitioner problem since they are being seen quickly in the ED? Who are the stakeholders? What is the delay? Test results not getting back? Are beds not available or clean? Are transporters not available? Dr. orders mean little if they are not carried out. Agree that these are operational issues, need to apply them more effectively to the situation. The analysis is somewhat consistent with the graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, and writing errors. The work is supported by at least five high-quality references but does not include two from peer-reviewed journals. Feedback: Less than the required 5 references. Numerous grammar issues. Need to work with writing center on APA and grammar. Some sentences are contradictory to others, seems to be more about grammar. Points Range: 0 (0.00%) - 13 (13.00%) The analysis is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, professional tone, and writing, or shows a heavy reliance on quoting. The work is not supported by at least five high-quality references including two from peer-reviewed journals. Raw Total: 73.50 (of 100)

Great paper

Great paper

Detailed to a perfection.

Great paper, well written.