Explore the four APN roles, and compare and contrast the pros and cons of each role against each other in order to determine the best choice for Jessica

/in /by

Historical Development of Advanced Practice Nursing and Evidence-Based Practice Discussio

Jessica, a baccalaureate prepared registered nurse, has been practicing for 8 years. Throughout her nursing career, she has worked in pediatric, surgical, and emergency departments. She worked as a floor nurse, a charge nurse, and she was recently offered a position in Nursing Administration. A stipulation for becoming a nurse administrator is that Jessica must attain a Master of Science in Nursing degree within 2 years of accepting the position. The offer prompted Jessica to contemplate her career. She is interested in returning to college, and wants to have greater impact on patient care but isn’t sure she will find that in an Administrative role, nor is she sure is ready for the responsibility of becoming a Nurse Practitioner. Jessica has decided to explore the advance practice roles available in nursing in order to determine the best MSN track for her. Jessica must choose one role (CNP, CRNA, CNS, CNM) and apply to a program, but she is unsure about the different roles and their individual scopes of practice. One colleague states, “You know, Jessica, working as an NP is great because you can diagnose and write prescriptions, and the accountability will fall on the physician you are working with.”
Discussion questions:

  • Is Jessica’s colleague right? Why or why not?
  • Explore the four APN roles, and compare and contrast the pros and cons of each role against each other in order to determine the best choice for Jessica. Consider issues such as work environment, level of accountability, patient population, salary, and scope of practice. Include each role of the APN on the list, and be certain to provide appropriate rationales and citations.

reference not older than 5 years. 300 words minimum

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Discuss which theory of aging you most believe in and why.

/in /by

Question description
From the beginning of time, the elusive phenomenon of preserving youth has been a topic of discussion in science, healthcare, technology, and everyday life. Is there anyone who would not be interested in knowing how the human organism ages? Doesn’t everyone want to live a long and healthy life? There are few who would not want to see what the future holds for our bodies and minds; even more curiosity surrounds what advances have been made or will possibly be made to alter and slow the aging process. Understanding what knowledge theories of aging have generated and reviewing the validity of these findings and how they impact evolution and scientific advances is a first step toward understanding the mystery of aging (Mauk, 2014).
Tasks:
In a minimum of 200 words, post your response to the following:
Discuss which theory of aging you most believe in and why. Provide examples. Support your discussion with references. After your original post, you are expected to provide a meaningful response to at least two other students.
Submission Details:

  • By the due date assigned, post your responses to this Discussion Area.
  • Through the end of the module, read all of your classmates’ postings and respond to at least two classmates’ posts that differ from your opinion. Consider sharing your own experiences and interpretation of the research. Support your findings with examples and scholarly references. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

Reference:

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

provide at least one scripture that supports or forbids same-sex behavior

/in /by

From your textbook and any other readings on sexual development, briefly discuss both biological and social contributions to the development of sexual identity and development.  Be sure your discussion includes both biological and social aspects of development across the lifespan.  Include  both same-sex and opposite sex identities in your discussion.
Then, provide at least one scripture that supports or forbids same-sex behavior.  It is important to distinguish between attraction and behavior in this part of the discussion.  Do you believe it is a sin to be attracted (tempted) to a person of the same-sex?  Do you believe it is a sin to act on that temptation by practicing homosexual behavior?  Do you believe the attraction is a product of “ nature” (biological) or “nurture” (social) or both?
Note, do not simply discuss what you “think” or “feel”.  Rather give valid bases for your answers.  These can include both scripture and scientific bases.  Just be sure to think critically regarding your sources and the application to your position.
NOTE: This is one question, but has two parts that should be connected with each other in your discussion.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Capstone Paper Rough Draft

/in /by

Capstone Paper Rough Draft

Question description****RESEARCH PAPER IS ATTACHED, PLEASE USE THE SAME REFERENCES LISTED ON THE PAPER DOCUMENT

WEEK 5: SUBMIT MILESTONE #5 THE CAPSTONE PAPER ROUGH DRAFT

The Research Paper Rough Draft

The purpose of this assignment is to draft and submit a comprehensive and complete rough draft of an APA research paper. Your rough draft should include all of the research paper elements of a final draft.

Recommended: Before you begin, review chapter 10 in A Pocket Style Manual (APA) and chapters 13 and 14 in Research Techniques for Health Sciences.

Include the following in your 12-15 page rough draft:

  • Headings
  • Title page
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Literature review: a review of relevant studies focusing on the theory and its importance and implication for the study
  • Research methods used and data collected
  • Results and analysis of research findings
  • Discussion of hypothesis/conclusion
  • Reference page with a minimum of 10 references and appropriately used in-text citations for each
  • Visuals: tables, figures, graphs, charts, images, or any other non-text content as applicable. You are required to include at least 1 visual aid in your final paper.
  • Footnotes (if applicable)
  • Appendices (if applicable)
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Discuss your decision-making process, and explain how critical and creative thinking contributed to the quality of your decision.

/in /by

In this assignment, you must examine the critical- and creating-thinking process, as well as their importance in higher-level thinking.
Create a 10- to 12-slide presentation, including detailed speaker notes, explaining critical- and creative-thinking skills. Include the following:

  • Identify an important decision you have made that required critical and creative thinking.
  • Discuss your decision-making process, and explain how critical and creative thinking contributed to the quality of your decision.
  • Identify characteristics of critical and creative thought.
  • Explain why critical and creative thinking are considered higher levels of thought.

Format your presentation according to appropriate course-level APA guidelines:

  • Treat the presentation as if it were an academic paper.
  • Make the first slide the title page slide.
  • Include in-text citations on any body slides that require them, revealing outside source information.
  • Make the last slide the References Page slide.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Evaluate a primary qualitative research peer-reviewed journal article that has healthcare implications

/in /by

Evaluate a primary qualitative research peer-reviewed journal article that has healthcare implications

NURSING SCIENCE

Competencies:
724.8.5: Foundations of Inquiry – The graduate differentiates between quality improvement processes, evidence based practice and research.
724.8.6 Literature Review and Analysis – The graduate demonstrates knowledge of the process and outcomes of conducting a literature review.
724.8.7: Ethics and Research – The graduate demonstrates understanding of the ethics of nursing research particularly human subjects� protections, informed consent and alignment with patient and family values and preferences.
724.8.8: Patient Outcomes – The graduate discriminates between identified standards and practices that do not provide improvements in patient outcomes utilizing relevant sources of evidence and the application of nursing theory.
724.8.9: Data Collection, Analysis, and Dissemination – The graduate describes the process of data collection, analysis and implementation of evidence that can improve clinical practice from an interprofessional perspective.

Introduction:

There are many sources of information available on the web and in journals relating to the nursing discipline. Therefore, it is of pivotal importance to understand the basic tenets of critical appraisal of research for its use in intraprofessional healthcare practices. The aim of evidence-based practice (EBP) is to employ a three-pronged approach blending the best available research evidence, patient values and preferences, and clinical expertise.

In this task, you will critique two primary research evidence sources. You will select one quantitative and one qualitative peer-reviewed journal article on a healthcare topic of interest.

Requirements:

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. Use the Turnitin Originality Report available in Taskstream as a guide for this measure of originality.

The rubric provides detailed criteria for evaluating your submission. You are expected to use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Note: Research evidence must not be more than ten years old.

A. Evaluate a primary quantitative research peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3�5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

1. Identify how the researcher addresses the five following areas of the selected journal article, using the attached �Evidence Table�:

� background or introduction

� review of the literature

� discussion of methodology

� data analysis

� researcher�s conclusion

2. Critique whether the evidence presented in each section of the journal article supports the researcher�s conclusion.

3. Explain the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations of the journal article.

4. Identify strengths and limitations of the study.

5. Describe how the evidence informs nursing practice.

B. Evaluate a primary qualitative research peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3�5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

1. Identify how the researcher addresses the five following areas of the selected journal article, using the attached �Evidence Table�:

� background or introduction

� review of the literature

� discussion of methodology

� data analysis

� researcher�s conclusion

2. Critique whether the evidence presented in each section of the journal article supports the researcher�s conclusion.

3. Explain the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations of the journal article.

4. Identify strengths and limitations of the study.

5. Describe how the evidence informs nursing practice.

C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

Evidence Table
A1 Quantitative Article: (Indicate primary evidence chosen with an APA citation)
Background or Introduction
Review of the Literature
Discussion of Methodology
Data Analysis
Researcher�s Conclusion

B1 Qualitative Article: (Indicate primary evidence chosen with an APA citation)
Background or Introduction
Review of the Literature
Discussion of Methodology
Data Analysis
Researcher�s Conclusion

XAP Task 1 (0416)
Not Evident Approaching Competence Competent Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics) The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response. The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.
A1. Quantitative: Article Areas Identification is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of the 5 given areas of the selected journal article. Identification has some incorrect information or addresses some of the 5 given areas of the selected journal article. Identification is correct and addresses the 5 given areas of the selected journal article.
A2. Quantitative: Researcher�s Conclusion Critique is not evident or is not supported by the evidence of the researcher�s conclusion, for any section. Critique provides vague information on whether the evidence supports the researcher�s conclusion, or the critique is only for some sections. Critique provides clear information on whether the evidence supports the researcher�s conclusion, for each section.
A3. Quantitative: Protection and Considerations
Explanation is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of human subject protection and/or cultural considerations. Explanation is vague and not relevant to human subject protection or cultural considerations. Explanation is clear and relevant to human subject protection and/or cultural considerations.
A4. Quantitative: Strengths and Limitations
Identification is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of the strengths or limitations. Identification is vague or incomplete (does not include strengths and/or limitations). Identification is clear and complete (includes logical strengths and limitations).
A5. Quantitative: Evidence Application
Description is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of how the evidence informs nursing practice. Description is vague concerning how the evidence informs nursing practice. Description is logical concerning how the evidence informs nursing practice.
B1. Qualitative: Article Areas Identification is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of the 5 given areas of the selected journal article. Identification has some inaccurate information or addresses some of the 5 given areas of the selected journal article. Identification is correct and addresses the 5 given areas of the selected journal article.
B2. Qualitative: Researcher�s Conclusion Critique is not evident or is not supported by the evidence of the researcher�s conclusion, for any section. Critique provides vague information on whether the evidence supports the researcher�s conclusion, or the critique is only for some sections. Critique provides clear information on whether the evidence supports the researcher�s conclusion, for each section.
B3. Qualitative: Protection and Considerations
Explanation is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of human subject protection and/or cultural considerations. Explanation is vague and not relevant to human subject protection or cultural considerations. Explanation is clear and relevant to human subject protection and/or cultural considerations.
B4. Qualitative: Strengths and Limitations
Identification is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of the strengths or limitations. Identification is vague or incomplete (does not include strengths and/or limitations). Identification is clear and complete (includes strengths and limitations).
B5. Qualitative: Evidence Application
Description is not evident or reflects a basic misunderstanding of how the evidence informs nursing practice. Description is vague concerning how the evidence informs nursing practice. Description is logical concerning how the evidence informs nursing practice.

 

smilesmile. .

get-your-custom-paper




The post Evaluate a primary qualitative research peer-reviewed journal article that has healthcare implications appeared first on nursing term paper.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Aristotle's Approach to Moral Judgment

/in /by

 

Aristotle’s Approach to Moral Judgment

According to Aristotle, virtue always lies at the mean between vicious extremes. Too much or too little of anything is invariably mistaken, but acting moderately is usually the path to happiness. Let us examine this approach to ethics by testing it in application to specific examples of two distinct kinds.
In your substantive post for this discussion, please describe two concrete situations from your own personal or professional life:

  • One in which Aristotle’s theory clearly seems to be on the right track.
  • Another where it gives the wrong advice.

In the first case, moderation would make sense, but in the second, you see how one of the extremes seems more virtuous.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Case Study Ethical Legal Dilemma Advanced Practice Nursing, health and medicine homework help

/in /by

Case Study Ethical Legal Dilemma Advanced Practice Nursing, health and medicine homework help

Question descriptionQuestion description

MN506_Unit04_Assignment_Introduction (1).docx

BasicTemplate_to_Use (2).docx

MN506: Unit 4 Assignment

Case Study Ethical Legal Dilemma Advanced Practice Nursing

Course outcomes addressed in this Assignment:

MN506-1: Apply theoretical frameworks and concepts to ethical dilemmas in the advanced practice role.

PC 2.3: Demonstrate integrity through the application of relevant codes of conduct and social responsibility within one’s profession.

Please take a moment to watch this Assignment Introduction, or read the presentation transcript.

Instructions:

Create an ethical legal decision-making dilemma involving an advanced practice nurse in the field of education, informatics, administration, or a nurse practitioner. Apply relevant codes of conduct that apply to the practice of nursing and your chosen field.

Include one ethical principle and one law that could be violated and whether the violation would constitute a civil or criminal act based on facts.

Construct a decision that demonstrates integrity and that would prevent violation of the ethical principle and prevent the law from being violated.

Describe the legal principles and laws that apply to the ethical dilemma.

Support the legal issues with prior legal cases or state or federal statutes.

Analyze the differences between ethical and legal reasoning and apply an ethical-legal reasoning model in the case study to create a basis for a solution to the ethical-legal dilemma.

List three recommendations that will resolve advanced practice nurses’ moral distress in the dilemma you have presented.

Based on the issue you presented and the rules of the law, apply the laws to your case and come up with a conclusion.

Note:

This is a fact-based Assignment that will not include your opinion.

This will require research and support for what is written.

The Assignment should be in your words after reading the scholarly and fact-based publications and have proper citations. There should be no quotations. The professor wants to hear your voice as a masters trained nurse.

Description

In the Unit 2 topic 1 Discussion, you will choose an ethical-legal dilemma that would cause the advanced practice nurse moral distress. You will write the introductory paragraphs for the Unit 4 Assignment in the Unit 2 topic 1 Discussion Board and post it for your peers to comment on.

You will continue working on the topic you have chosen and submit the paper using the most recent version of APA format. A template is provided in the left navigation of the course room for the paper. The paper should have a minimum of seven citations and some of these should be case law or applicable statutes. The Kaplan Library has Westlaw Campus Research database where you can find case laws that relate to your topic. The APA Manual and the textbook have instructions on legal formatting.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Describe and discuss what cultural issues may impact on you as an ICT professional if your organisation merges with another

/in /by

stion description

QUESTION 1

Describe and discuss what cultural issues may impact on you as an ICT professional if your organisation merges with another. Try to think deeply about some of the possible impacts on you and your career path that could result from an organisation merger or restructure.
Write 100-200 words in answer to this.

QUESTION 2

From your readings this week, especially in Part 3 of this week’s seminar, which framework are you going to use to analyse the scenarios in Assignment 1? Choose either MacDonald or White. Provide reasons to support why have you chosen this one.
Write 100-200 words to explain your choice. There is no need for discussion with your classmates of this question.

QUESTION 3

You are faced with a situation you feel may be unethical. How would you set about analysing the situation? Think carefully about the ethical analysis process, not the potential ethical dilemma. That is to say, try not to get caught up in developing and describing a scenario that is unethical. Rather, your focus is on the procedural aspect of dealing with a situation you feel may be unethical.
What questions do you need to ask yourself to determine whether this is an unethical situation? What facts or data do you need to consider and why? What, or who – might help you in your analysis? Use the Ethical Framework provided by White’s 3-step method to frame your responses to Question 3.
Write 150-250 words, to answer this question.
If you wish, choose a specific example of an unethical situation; either fictional, or that you have actually experienced.Discuss with your classmates the different approaches you each have taken and try to explain why there are differences, but once again, try not to get caught up in describing every detail of the situation but instead get to the heart of what makes it unethical, unprofessional or possibly risky in the context of the professional workplace.

QUESTION 4

Where you are working in your internship, locate your company’s Values statement or Code of Ethics, and ask your supervisor if you can either link to it from the company website in the discussion forum or reproduce it in the forum. If your supervisor refuses permission, or there is no Values statement or Code of Ethics, prepare one for their use based on the reading you have done. You might model it on one you have come across. If you need, look at theWestern Australia Public Sector Code of Ethics as a guide.
Write 100-200 words to evaluate the code of ethics or values statement, whichever you are working with, against this week’s readings. Discuss what is good about it, what might be missing and how it could be improved.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

What psycholegal questions need to be addressed?

/in /by

 

Competency 

In a minimum of 300 words, compare and contrast the differences between the psycholegal issues of competency and insanity (also known as criminal responsibility):

  • Briefly identify the legal standard used to determine competency through an evaluation. What psycholegal questions need to be addressed?
  • Briefly identify the legal standard used to determine insanity through an evaluation. What psycholegal questions need to be addressed?
  • Does a mentally ill individual need to be either competent or insane, or can a person be both? Why or why not?
  • Comment on whether someone who is not competent to stand trial should be forced to take medications to become competent in order to face full legal penalties for his or her crimes.ssignment 2: RA: Test Assessment Analysis
    For this assignment, you are to write a paper analyzing one test in each of the eight major assessment categories listed below.
    You should utilize at least five sources from additional professional literature, relevant textbooks, and the Mental Measurements Yearbook for relevant information on these testing instruments. Your paper should be approximately 10 pages long (approximately 1 page per test).
    Required Components:
    Mental Measurements Yearbook with Tests in Print can be found in the “M” section on the Find Articles and More page of the Argosy University online library. For each test using the Mental Measurements Yearbook, explain the following seven topics:

    • Test purpose
    • Uses, particularly in a forensic setting
    • Test development and history (any revisions made)
    • Normative information and test statistics
    • Applicable populations
    • Validity and reliability
    • Malingering or deception

    When your paper is complete, you will have a discussion on a total of eight tests (one from each of the categories mentioned below). Be sure to choose just one test from each category and do not discuss more than eight tests. Also, do not include any tests that are not listed below.
    Assessment Categories and Tests:

    • Mental Status Exam

    Appearance, Motor, Behavior, Sensorium, Thought Process, Thought Content, Communication, Speech, Perception, Mood, Affect, Cognition/Orientation, Response to Proverbs, Estimate of Intelligence, Memory, and Insight

    • Substance Abuse
      • Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI)
      • CAGE Questionnaire
    • IQ/Cognitive Functioning
      • Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th ed. (WAIS–IV)
      • Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 4th ed. (WISC-IV)
      • Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, 2nd ed. (KBIT-2)
      • California Verbal Learning Test, 2nd ed. (CVLT-II)
      • Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS)
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.