Critiquing the validity and robustness of research featured in journal articles provides a critical foundation for engaging in evidence-based practice.

/in /by

Critiquing the validity and robustness of research featured in journal articles provides a critical foundation for engaging in evidence-based practice. In Weeks 5 and 6, you explored quantitative research designs. In Week 7, you will examine qualitative and mixed methods research designs. For this Assignment, which is due by Day 7 of Week 7, you critique a quantitative and either a qualitative or a mixed methods research study and compare the types of information obtained in each.

To prepare:

  • Select a health topic of interest to you that is relevant to your current area of practice. The topic may be your Course Portfolio Project or a different topic of your choice.
  • Using the Walden Library, locate two articles in scholarly journals that deal with your portfolio topic: 1) Select one article that utilizes a quantitative research design and 2) select a second article that utilizes either a qualitative OR a mixed methods design. These need to be single studies not systematic or integrative reviews (including meta-analysis and metasynthesis). You may use research articles from your reference list. If you cannot find these two types of research on your portfolio topic, you may choose another topic.
  • Locate the following documents in this week’s Learning Resources to access the appropriate templates, which will guide your critique of each article:
    • Critique Template for a Qualitative Study
    • Critique Template for a Quantitative Study
    • Critique Template for a Mixed-Methods Study
  • Consider the fields in the templates as you review the information in each article. Begin to draft a paper in which you analyze the two research approaches as indicated below. Reflect on the overall value of both quantitative and qualitative research. If someone were to say to you, “Qualitative research is not real science,” how would you respond?

To complete this Assignment:

  • Complete the two critiques using the appropriate templates.
  • Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
  • Contrast the types of information that you gained from examining the two different research approaches in the articles that you selected.
    • Describe the general advantages and disadvantages of the two research approaches featured in the articles. Use examples from the articles for support.
    • Formulate a response to the claim that qualitative research is not real science. Highlight the general insights that both quantitative and qualitative studies can provide to researchers. Support your response with references to the Learning Resources and other credible sources.
  • As you complete this Assignment, remember to:
  • Submit your paper to Grammarly and SafeAssign through the Walden Writing Center. Based on the Grammarly and SafeAssign reports, revise your paper as necessary.
  • Reminder: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The School of Nursing Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available from the Walden University website found in this week’s Learning Resources). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
  • Combine all three parts of this assignment into one Word document including both critique templates and the narrative with your references. Submit this combined document.

 

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Create a New Plan State what your three worst dietary habits are.Why are they considered bad habits?

/in /by

Create a New Plan State what your three worst dietary habits are.Why are they considered bad habits?

ONE WEEK FOOD JOURNAL

Food Journal Name Chamberlain College of Nursing NR 228Nutrition, Health and Wellness Date or Term Introduction Title ofPaper Goes Here (Centered, not bolded) In this first paragraph,share that you have recorded your food intake and exercise habitsover a certain period of time. Explain why proper nutrition andexercise is important. Explain the purpose of the paper in thefirst paragraph. Be sure to use in text citations as applicable(following APA format). Analyzing the First Two Weeks In thissection you should share how your food intake and exercise comparesto what is recommended. Address your calorie intake compared towhat is recommended. Address your fat, sodium, and cholesterolintake compared to what is recommended. Address what othernutrients (such as calcium, protein, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, etc.)you consumed adequate amounts of. Address what nutrients youconsumed inadequate amounts of (either too much or too little of).Address how your activity level compares to what is recommended.What potential implications do these findings have on your overallhealth (including what health risks these findings may have, orwhat health benefits your findings possibly give you)?

 

smilesmilePLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPER TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

get-your-custom-paper




The post Create a New Plan State what your three worst dietary habits are.Why are they considered bad habits? appeared first on nursing term paper.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Validity in research

/in /by

Validity in research refers to the extent researchers can be confident that the cause and effect they identify in their research are in fact causal relationships. If there is low validity in a study, it usually means that the research design is flawed and the results will be of little or no value. Four different aspects of validity should be considered when reviewing a research design: statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, construct validity, and external validity. In this Discussion, you consider the importance of each of these aspects in judging the validity of quantitative research.

To prepare:

· Review the information in Chapter 10 of the course text on rigor and validity.

· Read the method section of one of the following quasi-experimental studies (also located in this week’s Learning Resources). Identify at least one potential concern that could be raised about the study’s internal validity.

o Metheny, N. A., Davis-Jackson, J., & Stewart, B. J. (2010). Effectiveness of an aspiration risk-reduction protocol. Nursing Research, 59(1), 18–25.

o Padula, C. A., Hughes, C., & Baumhover, L. (2009). Impact of a nurse-driven mobility protocol on functional decline in hospitalized older adults. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 24(4), 325–331.

o Yuan, S., Chou, M., Hwu, L., Chang, Y., Hsu, W., & Kuo, H. (2009). An intervention program to promote health-related physical fitness in nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(10), 1,404–1,411.

· Consider strategies that could be used to strengthen the study’s internal validity and how this would impact the three other types of validity.

· Think about the consequences of an advanced practice nurse neglecting to consider the validity of a research study when reviewing the research for potential use in developing an evidence-based practice.

Post the title of the study that you selected and your analysis of the potential concerns that could be raised about the study’s internal validity. Propose recommendations to strengthen the internal validity and assess the effect your changes could have with regard to the other three types of validity. Discuss the dangers of failing to consider the validity of a research study.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Compare and contrast CEA, CUA, and CBA.

/in /by

This module taught you that economic evaluation has become a vital part of program evaluation over the past couple of decades as stakeholders have demanded economic efficiency in their agencies and programs. The textbook discusses three types of economic evaluation methods: the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), the cost-unity analysis (CUA), and the cost-benefit analysis (CBA).
Tasks:
In about 200 words, respond to the following:

  • Compare and contrast CEA, CUA, and CBA.
  • Find an article that discusses a program evaluation where at least one of these was used. Why do you think the evaluator chose this specific analysis? How were the findings from the analysis applied to the overall evaluation?
  • In your program evaluation plan in M5 Assignment 2 RA 2, which of these do you think would be the best fit for the social agency or human services program? Why?13) I will not knowingly mislead or make false claims about what my client or sponsor will receive from the coaching process or from me as the coach.
    14) I will not give my prospective clients or sponsors information or advice I know or believe to be misleading or false.
    15) I will have clear agreements or contracts with my clients and sponsor(s). I will honor all agreements or contracts made in the context of professional coaching relationships.
    16) I will carefully explain and strive to ensure that, prior to or at the initial meeting, my coaching client and sponsor(s) understand the nature of coaching, the nature and limits of confidentiality, financial arrangements, and any other terms of the coaching agreement or contract.
    17) I will be responsible for setting clear, appropriate, and culturally sensitive boundaries that govern any physical contact I may have with my clients or sponsors.
    18) I will not become sexually intimate with any of my current clients or sponsors.
    19) I will respect the client’s right to terminate the coaching relationship at any point during the process, subject to the provisions of the agreement or contract. I will be alert to indications that the client is no longer benefiting from our coaching relationship.
    20) I will encourage the client or sponsor to make a change if I believe the client or sponsor would be better served by another coach or by another resource.
    21) I will suggest my client seek the services of other professionals when deemed necessary or appropriate.
    Section 4: Confidentiality/Privacy
    As a coach:
    22) I will maintain the strictest levels of confidentiality with all client and sponsor information. I will have a clear agreement or contract before releasing information to another person, unless required by law.
    23) I will have a clear agreement upon how coaching information will be exchanged among coach, client, and sponsor.
    24) When acting as a trainer of student coaches, I will clarify confidentiality policies with the students.
    25) I will have associated coaches and other persons whom I manage in service of my clients and their sponsors in a paid or volunteer capacity make clear agreements or contracts to adhere to the ICF Code of Ethics Part 2, Section 4: Confidentiality/Privacy standards and the entire ICF Code of Ethics to the extent applicable.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Summary of the article, strengths and deficits of the article, and the significance of the article to the student’s learning.

/in /by

Summary of the article, strengths and deficits of the article, and the significance of the article to the student’s learning.

Topic: Current ethical issues in nursing

Order Description
Select an article from a nursing journal that addresses an ethical issue. (Journals other than nursing may be considered but MUST be approved by the instructor.) This paper should be APA formatted with no more than 4 pages of text. The content should include a summary of the article, strengths and deficits of the article, and the significance of the article to the student’s learning.

 

smilesmile. .

get-your-custom-paper




The post Summary of the article, strengths and deficits of the article, and the significance of the article to the student’s learning. appeared first on nursing term paper.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Developing social problems into research problems for graduate study

/in /by

 
Resources for this week’s question, please incorporate resources into answer.
Babbie, E. (2017). Basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
· Chapter 15, “Reading and Writing Social Research”
· Laureate Education (Producer). (2016b). Literature review [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
·
· Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 8 minutes.
·
· Dr. Patton speaks about the role of literature in the research process.
·
· Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript

Brown, M. (2013). Developing social problems into research problems for graduate study [Online webcast]. Retrieved from Evaluating Use of Literature and Problem Statement

Researchers use scholarly literature for various purposes in their work, such as, but not limited to, establishing the need for and importance of their study or describing a theory. The problem statement is typically tied to the literature, and for this reason, these two components of research are presented together this week; this connection among research components will be a recurring theme throughout this course.
For this Discussion, you will evaluate the use of literature and problem statements in assigned journal articles in your discipline to understand what it means for a research study to be justified, grounded, and original. You will use the Use of Literature Checklist, the Problem Statement Checklist, and the Litmus Test as guides for your post.
With these thoughts in mind, refer to the Journal Articles document for your assigned articles for this Discussion. If your last name starts with A through L, use Article A. If your last name starts with M through Z, use Article B. Follow the prompt below for your program.
Master’s and research doctorate (PhD) students
By Day 4
Post a critique of the research study in which you:
· Evaluate the authors’ use of literature using the Use of Literature Checklist as a guide
· Evaluate the research problem using the Problem Statement Checklist as a guide
· Explain what it means for a research study to be justified and grounded in the literature; then, explain what it means for a problem to be original using the Litmus Test as a guide
Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.
Stedman-Smith, M., DuBois, C. L., & Grey, S. F. (2015). Hand hygiene performance and beliefs among public university employees. Journal of Health Psychology, 20(10), 1263–1274. doi: 10.1177/1359105313510338
By Day 4
Post a critique of the research study in which you:

  • Evaluate the authors’ use of      literature using the Use of Literature Checklist as a      guide.
  • Evaluate the problem using      the Problem Statement Checklist as a guide.
  • Explain what it means for a      research study to be justified and grounded in      the literature; then, explain what it means for a problem to be original using      the Litmus Test as a guide

· https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udfldYXvUxw&feature=youtu.be
Problem Statement Checklist Use the following criteria to evaluate an author’s problem statement:
• Is a problem identified that leads to the need for this study?
• Is a rationale or justification for the problem clearly stated?
• Is the problem framed in a way that is consistent with the research approach?
• Does the statement convey how the study will address the problem?
• Are the citations to literature current (i.e., within the past 5 years with the exception of seminal works)?
Use of Literature Checklist
Use the following criteria to evaluate an author’s use of literature.
• Look for indications of the following ways the author used literature:
• Introduce a problem
• Introduce a theory
• Provide direction to the research questions and/or hypotheses
• Compare results with existing literature or predictions
• Did the author mention the problem addressed by the study?
• Is the purpose of the study stated?
• Are key variables in the study defined?
• Is information about the sample, population, or participants provided?
• Are the key results of the study summarized?
• Does the author provide a critique of the literature?
• Are sources cited to support points?
• Are the citations to recent literature (within the past 5 years with the exception of seminal works)?
• Does the literature justify the importance of the topic studied?
Litmus Test for a Doctoral-Level Research Problem
Background on these “litmus test” questions 
· The distinguishing characteristic of doctoral-level research (as opposed to masters level) is that it must make an original contribution to the field. However, students may struggle to identify what will authentically contribute to their field or discipline.
· The most critical step in making such a contribution is to first identify a research problem with the 4 doctoral hallmarks below. Identifying a doctoral-level research problem is “necessary, but not sufficient,” to produce doctoral-level capstone.
REQUIRED DOCTORAL HALLMARKS OF THE RESEARCH PROBLEM
In   Walden’s scholar-practitioner model, a research problem shows promise of   contributing meaningfully to the field ONLY if the answer to ALL of the   following questions is “yes.”
Yes
No
1. JUSTIFIED?
Is there evidence   that this problem is significant to the professional field?
There     must be relevant statistics (expressing an unjust inequality, financial     impact, lost efficiency, etc.), documentable discrepancies (e.g., two     models that are difficult to reconcile), and/or other scholarly facts that     point to the significance and urgency of the problem. The problem must be     an authentic “puzzle” that needs solving, not merely a topic that the     researcher finds interesting.
2. GROUNDED IN THE   LITERATURE?

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Describe the occasion in which you were being evaluated

/in /by

REFLECTIVE PAPER EVALUATING YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS IN THE WORKPLACE

PSY 302 – Week 4: Performance Appraisal and Positive Psychology

For this assignment you will write a two- to- three page reflective paper evaluating your experience with performance appraisals in the workplace.  If you have never had a workplace performance appraisal, interview a friend or family member who has had one.

Describe the occasion in which you were being evaluated (e.g., annual review, quarterly review).  Describe the strengths and weaknesses of the evaluation process using concepts and/or theories from the week’s readings.  Provide at least two strategies to improve the performance appraisal process in your workplace for a more positive experience in the future.

Your assignment must be at least two to three double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA guidelines as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.  Include a cover page and reference page in APA format.  In addition to the textbook, you must utilize at least one scholarly, peer-reviewed source that was published within the past five years.  Your sources must be cited according to APA format as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Define actual and emerging problems (MY PROJECT PROBLEM IS STUDENT NURSES overcoming barriers of mandatory flu vaccine in order to do clinical rotation in the hospital setting) as they relate to aggregate systems in the delivery of healthcare

/in /by

Overcoming Perceived Student Nurses, health and medicine homework help

Question descriptionOrder Description
FOR WRITE AN ESSAY 4 ME:
In your journal entry, evaluate your practicum experience for
this course, including reflection on your development as a
scholar-practitioner and nurse leader.
Complete and submit an evaluation of your practicum
experiences – Practicum involved Clinical research project
on nursing students overcoming mandatory flu vaccine,
understanding their perception, Goal is that with education
they changed their perspective.
Some of my insights during this practicum highlighted:
(Practicum – experience was interesting with the
professionals and organizations met, both nationally and
internationally – however, challenges were with meetings
with preceptor who changed appointments or had other
plans at the expense of the student; therefore the ability to
get the involvement of stakeholders interested in the project
without wavering from beginning to end was a valuable
resource)
In order to do a thoughtful reflection, begin preparing for
that as soon as possible. Consider how your skills and
knowledge have grown in the following areas as you prepare
your self-evaluation:
Program – I am getting a DNP
• Leadership – (one of my example) I became governmental
affairs
• Advanced nursing practice –
• Promoting quality improvement
• Improving health outcomes
• Informing health care policy
Review the Practicum Experience Evaluation document
found in this week’s Learning Resources for further
instructions on what you may include in your evaluation.
Guidelines
Define actual and emerging problems (MY PROJECT
PROBLEM IS STUDENT NURSES overcoming barriers of
mandatory flu vaccine in order to do clinical rotation in the
hospital setting) as they relate to aggregate systems in the
delivery of healthcare.
1. What are the key problems or issues related to the
students’ specialization? Students may consult the literature
as well as their preceptor and practicum-setting leaders.
2. Review current nursing professional practice standards
(ANA, AACN) as identified in coursework (ie: 1.
Implementation of Evidence based project relating to flu
vaccine among students or Health care students/workers
(EBP)2. Evaluation of EBP regarding project topic. 3.
Implications of EBP and 4. dissemination of the findings of
implications of EBP with nursing students or healthcare
workers getting the flu
Must have references – scholarly done.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

What is the difference between common sense and practical wisdom in health care?

/in /by

What is the difference between common sense and practical wisdom in health care?

What is the difference between common sense and practical wisdom in health care?

What are some emerging models and roles for healthcare providers, and how do these new models and roles underscore the need to understand how to use common sense or practical wisdom in decision making?

 

smilesmile. .

get-your-custom-paper




The post What is the difference between common sense and practical wisdom in health care? appeared first on nursing term paper.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Which characteristics or approaches demonstrated by this person would you integrate into your own leadership style?

/in /by

Question description
Discussion: Leadership Style
Throughout your career, you will work with many people who display differing leadership styles. As a nurse leader, it is imperative that you communicate well and get along with those whose leadership style does not align with your preferences. It is also important to understand your own leadership style, as this can prompt insight into how others relate to you and what skills you may need to develop as your leadership responsibilities grow.
To prepare:

  • Review the information in the Learning Resources, including the leadership styles identified in Chapter 2 of the course text.
  • Bring to mind a leader in your organization or one with which you are familiar. Would you describe his or her style as authoritative, democratic, or laissez-faire? Why?
  • Which characteristics or approaches demonstrated by this person would you integrate into your own leadership style? Which ones would you prefer not to integrate?
  • Think about how this leader’s style and resulting interactions may impact health care quality and patient outcomes.

Post a description of a leader, distinguishing his or her style as authoritative, democratic, or laissez-faire. Describe the characteristics that inform your perception, and explain which ones you would integrate into your own leadership style, as well as which ones you would prefer not to integrate. Explain at least one potential effect of this leadership style on health care quality and patient outcomes.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.