HOW THE PRACTICE OF NURSING IS EXPECTED TO GROW AND CHANGE.The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by CCNE and AACN using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses.

HOW THE PRACTICE OF NURSING IS EXPECTED TO GROW AND CHANGE.The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by CCNE and AACN using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses.

The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by CCNE and AACN using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, their specific care discipline, and their local communities.

As the country focuses on the restructuring of the U.S. health care delivery system, nurses will continue to play an important role. It is expected that more and more nursing jobs will become available out in the community, and fewer will be available in acute care hospitals.

Write an informal presentation (500-700 words) to educate nurses about how the practice of nursing is expected to grow and change. Include the concepts of continuity or continuum of care, accountable care organizations (ACO), medical homes, and nurse-managed health clinics.
Share your presentation with nurse colleagues on your unit or department and ask them to offer their impressions of the anticipated changes to health care delivery and the new role of nurses in hospital settings, communities, clinics, and medical homes.
In 800-1,000 words summarize the feedback shared by three nurse colleagues and discuss whether their impressions are consistent with what you have researched about health reform.
A minimum of three scholarly references are required for this assignment.
In addition to submitting this assignment in the LoudCloud dropbox, email a copy of your submission to.edu”>RNBSNclientcare@gcu.edu.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.


 

smilesmile. .

get-your-custom-paper






The post HOW THE PRACTICE OF NURSING IS EXPECTED TO GROW AND CHANGE.The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by CCNE and AACN using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. appeared first on nursing term paper.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

What are the differences and similarities among adjustment disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and acute stress disorder?

 

Assignment 1: Adjustment Disorder, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, and Acute Stress Disorder

Adjustment disorders are quite common and potentially very serious because they have been linked to suicide ideation, planned and completed suicide. Consider the important issues of mental status examination and differential diagnosis.

  • What are the differences and similarities among adjustment disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and acute stress disorder?
  • What are the essential areas that encompass a thorough mental status examination?
  • Explain the steps you would take in evaluating symptoms. How would you arrive at a differential diagnosis?

Post your responses in a minimum of 300 words.
Submission Details:

  • By the due date assigned, post your responses to this Discussion Area.
  • Through the end of the module, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts. While responding, identify the similarities and differences between what you have constructed and what your classmates have.

Discussion Grading Table  Maximum Points    Quality of initial posting, including fulfillment of assignment   16    Quality of responses to classmates  12    Frequency of responses to classmates  4    Reference to supporting readings and other materials  4    Language and grammar  4    Total:  40               M3 Assignment 1 Discussion  Discussion Topic           Due September 22 at 11:59 PM

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

What assessment questions would you ask this family in order to determine the severity of the problem?

Psychology homework help

Watch one of the following movies:

1. Rachel Getting Married

2. 28 days

3. When a Man Loves a Woman

Write a 4 pages paper discussing your analysis and observation of the family in the movie. Apply what you have learned in this course so far,as well as in your previous MFT courses.

Address the following topics in your paper.

·  What assessment questions would you ask this family in order to determine the severity of the problem? Include questions that relate to the topics of environment, the family system and individual development, as outlined in Ch. 5 of The Alcoholic Family in Recovery.

· What is your conceptualization of the problem? Provide a systemic summary of what is happening with this family system, including specific data from the movie case study to backup your conceptualization.

· Discuss the family’s recovery stage, including behavioral evidence for your assessment of their stage. Include information about how you ruled out other stages.

· Discuss your recommendation for therapy. What are the primary tasks for therapy in order for this family to move into ongoing recovery?

Follow APA format- 4 pages.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

What are some of the planning strategies that Russ might have used that would possibly have positively affected the outcome of the strategic plan execution?

WHAT ARE SOME OF THE PLANNING STRATEGIES THAT RUSS MIGHT HAVE USED THAT WOULD POSSIBLY HAVE POSITIVELY AFFECTED THE OUTCOME OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN EXECUTION?

What are some of the planning strategies that Russ might have used that would possibly have positively affected the outcome of the strategic plan execution?  Discuss some things Marvelous Marvin could have done differently as CEO in order avoid the current situation?  What political factors created bias and clouded judgments in this situation?  Who’s to blame for the bad outcomes of this strategic plan?  If you were one of the OR Director’s direct reports/managers, what should your involvement in the organization’s strategy have been? Guidelines:  Assignment should be a minimum of 5 pages, excluding the title page and reference page.  Utilize a minimum of 5 references, only 1 can be the text book.  Fully answer all questions above and follow proper APA guidelines.  Submit your assignment through the Turnitin link located in the “Assignment Dropbox”.

 Assignments that have a Plagiarism Rate from Turnitin of higher than 30% will automatically receive a 0. I strongly recommend that you submit prior to due date so you can correct if your rate is higher than this.  No Assignments will be accepted late, No exceptions! Last Chance Hospital – Case Study Last Chance Hospital (LCH) is a 254-bed, community hospital located in a small, affluent suburb, just outside of San Diego, California. The hospital has historically been wellreceived by the local community, which demographically has a higher concentration of older age groups than most other local areas. The greater San Diego area is densely populated, and over twenty-five hospitals operate in the larger geographic area. Historically, LCH had always been financially sound, and had managed to remain independent as their local competitors joined larger systems. But that was then, and this is now. About a year ago, Last Chance Hospital undertook a strategic planning process to encompass the next years. At the time, the hospital was doing okay financially, but was starting to dip into their cash reserves more often than the Board of Trustees liked; LCH was in need of an ideal strategy to bring them ahead of the market before things got out of hand. As the strategic planner for LCH, Russ Newmarket reported indirectly to the CEO, Marvelous Marvin, but his immediate boss was Courtney Graveyard – and she had a lot on her plate. LCH did not have a chief nursing officer, and as COO, Graveyard was responsible for all of the nursing departments as well as surgical services, facilities, and information technology

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Which theory is relevant to your client’s case? Describe the relevant points of the theory and if applicable, which stage(s) are present. (1–2 pages) For example, Erikson’s Psychosocial

Follow the Rubric attached for each section of this Assignment, you will synthesize your understanding of the theories, best practices, and current trends in psychology to create a case. Begin by deciding on the type of job that interests you within your concentration ( My concentration is I/O psychology). Imagine that you are a professional and create a hypothetical client whom you may encounter. Please note that the client does not always need to be an individual, but may be an agency, organization, or institution.
Here are some examples of a starting point for clients
Industrial/Organizational Psychology: A supermarket that is seeking help with improving employee satisfaction and reducing employee turnover.
Please note that these are just some ideas and you should create a client that is interesting and relevant to you. In order to avoid potential confidentiality breaches, this should be a fictitious client, not a real person you know or have worked with.
Use the paper structure below to organize the facts and recommendations for your hypothetical client. Follow the Rubric attached step by step.

  1. Client demographics: For individual clients, you should include the client’s name, age, marital status, occupation, and relevant family information (such as children or involved siblings or parents). If your client is an agency or organization, describe the type of institution and information on the purpose and employees or clients (for example: A business that specializes in advertising and employs 40 individuals; a high school for children with learning disabilities.) This should be 2–3 paragraphs.
  2. Presenting problem: What is the reason for the client receiving your services? Be specific about the problem, but do not add many extra details by “telling the client’s story.” This should be a 2–3 paragraph description about the problem as the client perceives it.
  3. Goals: What are the client’s main intervention/treatment goals? Two or three goals should be provided, and these should be specific and measurable. When writing goals, remember that these should describe the outcome the client wants to achieve. (1–2 pages)
  4. Relevant theoretical constructs: Which theory is relevant to your client’s case? Describe the relevant points of the theory and if applicable, which stage(s) are present. (1–2 pages) For example, Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory may be relevant to work with a client who is struggling to develop a sense of self amid peer pressure, particularly the stage of Identity versus Role Confusion. You would clearly describe the main points of the theory and relevant stage(s). Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory may apply to a client using defense mechanisms when dealing with addiction issues. You would give a general description of the theory and then discuss the relevant defense mechanisms.
  5. Intervention methods: Synthesize the theoretical model you chose above to explain the intervention methods you will utilize to help you client meet the goals. Remember that interventions should be based on documented evidence in your concentration, meaning that you should support your ideas with academic materials to show how they are appropriate. For example, what intervention strategies could be used to help the child dealing with Identify versus Role Confusion? (1–2 pages)
  6. Cultural considerations: What cultural issues will you need to consider when working with your client? Culture can refer to age, gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, disability, language, and socioeconomic status. (1 page)
  7. Use of technology: Explain how you could use contemporary technology in your work with this client. For example, you could consider how technology is used to:
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

A patient is brought to the hospital following an ATLS assessment after a horse riding incident.

A patient is brought to the hospital following an ATLS assessment after a horse riding incident.

a) Discuss the role of ATLS during the “golden hour”, its impact on the patient care pathway, and the concept of trimodal distribution of death.
(10marks).

b) When the patient arrives in the emergency department they are imaged in the resuscitation room using conventional radiography of the chest and abdomen. The images are “hot reported” by an advanced practitioner radiographer.

i) In relation to current guidelines critically evaluate the role of conventional imaging in trauma radiography for the scenario
(5 marks)

ii) Discuss the additional level of training and responsibility required for a radiographer undertaking an advanced practitioner role in conventional reporting
(5marks)

c) Conventional imaging proves inconclusive in the detection of free abdominal fluid. Critically evaluate the roles of Ultrasound and CT imaging in this respect

(10 marks)

Total 30 marks

Question 2

Scenario: It is early Saturday evening on a foggy winter’s day. There is a radiographer working with you however they are currently on ICU completing 3 mobile chest examinations and you are the Band 5 radiographer working single-handed in the A&E X-ray dept. Your hospital is a major trauma centre within the Major Trauma Network and you receive a Major Incident alert. There has been a multi- vehicle pile-up on the motorway, about 6 miles away from your hospital. Many of the vehicles involved belong to fans who were returning home to Leeds after a Premier League football match. At the time the incident is declared, there are thought to be up to 15 people dead or seriously wounded, approximately 20 severely injured casualties; plus many others who have sustained minor injuries. A major incident was declared by the senior officer on site. Your hospital is one of the first hospitals to be notified.


 

smilesmile. .

get-your-custom-paper






The post A patient is brought to the hospital following an ATLS assessment after a horse riding incident. appeared first on nursing term paper.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course

 
Details:
In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.
Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

  1. Background
  2. Problem statement
  3. Purpose of the change proposal
  4. PICOT
  5. Literature search strategy employed
  6. Evaluation of the literature
  7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized
  8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures
  9. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome
  10. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to the portfolio components before submitting.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
RUBRIC

1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Background Background section is not present. Background section is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Background section is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Background section is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Background section is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Problem Statement Problem statement is not present. Problem statement is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Problem statement is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Problem statement is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Problem statement is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Change Proposal Purpose Purpose of change proposal is not present. Purpose of change proposal is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Purpose of change proposal is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Purpose of change proposal is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Purpose of change proposal is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %PICOT PICOT is not present. PICOT is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. PICOT is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. PICOT is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. PICOT is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Literature Search Strategy Literature search strategy is not present. Literature search strategy is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Literature search strategy is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Literature search strategy is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Literature search strategy is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Literature Evaluation Literature evaluation is not present. Literature evaluation is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Literature evaluation is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Literature evaluation is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Literature evaluation is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Utilization of Change or Nursing Theory (2.2) Theory utilization is not present. Theory utilization content is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Theory utilization content is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Theory utilization content is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Theory utilization content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome Measures (3.2) Implementation plan is not present. Implementation plan is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Implementation plan is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Implementation plan is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Implementation plan is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (2.3) Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and /or discussion component is not present. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, but is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Appendices Inclusive of Practice Immersion Clinical Documentation (1.2) Appendices are not present. Appendices are present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Appendices are present with minor elements missing that do not impede understanding. Appendices are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Appendices are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
10.0 %Evidence of Revision Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques. Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete. Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present. Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided. Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.
30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
10.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
Details:
In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.
Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

  1. Background
  2. Problem statement
  3. Purpose of the change proposal
  4. PICOT
  5. Literature search strategy employed
  6. Evaluation of the literature
  7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized
  8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures
  9. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome
  10. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to the portfolio components before submitting.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful
RUBRIC

1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 %Background Background section is not present. Background section is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Background section is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Background section is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Background section is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Problem Statement Problem statement is not present. Problem statement is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Problem statement is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Problem statement is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Problem statement is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Change Proposal Purpose Purpose of change proposal is not present. Purpose of change proposal is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Purpose of change proposal is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Purpose of change proposal is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Purpose of change proposal is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %PICOT PICOT is not present. PICOT is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. PICOT is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. PICOT is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. PICOT is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Literature Search Strategy Literature search strategy is not present. Literature search strategy is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Literature search strategy is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Literature search strategy is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Literature search strategy is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Literature Evaluation Literature evaluation is not present. Literature evaluation is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Literature evaluation is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Literature evaluation is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Literature evaluation is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Utilization of Change or Nursing Theory (2.2) Theory utilization is not present. Theory utilization content is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Theory utilization content is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Theory utilization content is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Theory utilization content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome Measures (3.2) Implementation plan is not present. Implementation plan is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Implementation plan is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Implementation plan is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Implementation plan is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (2.3) Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and /or discussion component is not present. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, but is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
5.0 %Appendices Inclusive of Practice Immersion Clinical Documentation (1.2) Appendices are not present. Appendices are present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. Appendices are present with minor elements missing that do not impede understanding. Appendices are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. Appendices are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
10.0 %Evidence of Revision Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques. Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete. Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present. Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided. Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.
30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
10.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

What are the differences between special and common cause variation and what tool is used to help identify incidences of both?

What are the differences between special and common cause variation and what tool is used to help identify incidences of both?

2. What are the differences between special and common cause variation and what tool is used to help identify incidences of both?

3. What are some advantages to using CTQ trees?

4. Which Six Sigma tool is used to determine process stability and predictability?

5. What are some advantages and disadvantages for conducting a stakeholder analysis?

6. How could you effectively use a “payoff matrix?” Explain briefly.

7. Describe what tools can be used to run effective team meetings? How can they help?

8. How does Lean “Standardization” differ from traditional Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)?

9. Briefly explain the three core principles of Lean.

10. What are some examples of the effective application of standardization in healthcare?

11. How can standardization be applied to not turn staff into robots?

12. How can leaders reduce staff resistance to standardization?

13. What is a realistic application of Takt in healthcare other than drawing lab specimens?

14. How can you standardize training programs?

15. Why are visual management and controls effective?

Extra Credit:
16. What is the most important part of 5S and why? State your case.

17. Do you think that 5S should be modified to 6S by including “safety?” Why not?

18. How could Kanban be used to prevent supply “hoarding in hospitals


 

smilesmile. .

get-your-custom-paper






The post What are the differences between special and common cause variation and what tool is used to help identify incidences of both? appeared first on nursing term paper.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Statement of studies and/or sources of evidence that were included and excluded in the appraisal including rationale for the decision to include or exclude.

Statement of studies and/or sources of evidence that were included and excluded in the appraisal including rationale for the decision to include or exclude.

Chapter 1
Introduction and Statement of the EBP project:
-Identification of Phenomenon of Interest or problem
– Background of the problem
-Significance of the problem
– Purpose statement
– Statement of the problem in PICOT format and burning clinical question
– Conceptual and Operational definition of Concept(s)

Chapter 2- Critical appraisal of the evidence
– Introduction- repeat purpose
– Search strategies and yield
– Statement of studies and/or sources of evidence that were included and excluded in the appraisal including rationale for the decision to include or exclude
– Explanation of the literature review protocols (ex. AGREE, CASP, etc.)used to conduct the critical appraisal and definition and source of levels of evidence
– Theoretical review of concepts
– Evaluation and synthesis of evidence and recommendations. Relevance to:
Practice change
Prospective implementation
Alternate recommendations
– Summary

Characteristics (FINER)of a good study question:

Feasible
Interesting
Novel (add to, extend, refute, what is already known)
Ethical
Relevant

Establish significance of the problem:
What is the incidence of this particular problem?
How many individuals are affected by this problem?
Will studying this problem actually improve the care that is delivered?
Will studying the problem potentially improve health policy?
Will studying the intervention lead to better health outcomes in patients?
Will studying the problem assist clinicians in giving a better understanding in the area so that more sensitive clinical care can be delivered?


 

smilesmilePLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING TERM PAPER TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

get-your-custom-paper






The post Statement of studies and/or sources of evidence that were included and excluded in the appraisal including rationale for the decision to include or exclude. appeared first on nursing term paper.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

How can the brain repair itself or restore lost function after TBI or other brain damage (focus on the concept of neuroplasticity)?

How can the brain repair itself or restore lost function after TBI or other brain damage (focus on the concept of neuroplasticity)?

which cover brain injury and repair, analyze the clinical, biological, and psychological factors that are important in successful brain function recovery outcomes. How can the brain repair itself or restore lost function after TBI or other brain damage (focus on the concept of neuroplasticity)? Wilson (2012) lists ways that the brain can repair itself, but reminds us later in the chapter that, in most areas of the brain, replication of neurons by mitosis to replace lost/dead neurons only occurs in immature brains (i.e., essentially those younger than age two). There are some areas (e.g., the hippocampus, which is responsible for memory) that have neurogenesis, but other areas of the brain must utilize neuroplasticity to restore lost function.

In addition, discuss what clinical, biological, and psychological factors are important in successful brain function recovery outcomes. What are some clinical interventions (e.g., medication, surgery, stem cell therapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, rehabilitation techniques, and psychotherapy) that help facilitate the restoration of lost brain function? Include information on brain structures, pathways, neurotransmitters/receptors, and psychological factors when discussing the topic areas above. Additional emphasis should be placed on relating the underlying pathology of brain trauma and damage to the actual biologic mechanism of how various treatments support repair or restoration of function.

In keeping with the focus of this class, the emphasis should be placed on the role of neurotransmitter and receptor systems, neuroanatomical structures, and neurological functional pathways. You must use a minimum of one peer-reviewed source that was published within the last five years, documented in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Your post should be a minimum of 250 words. You may cite and reference your textbook, required reading and/or multimedia, but these will not fulfill the source requirement.

Guided Response: Respond substantively to a minimum of two of your classmate’s posts that have identified different neurotransmitters than you. Your responses should address both the neurotransmitter/receptor system and neuroanatomical structures involved in TBI. In addition, please observe the following guidelines for all respons


 

smilesmile. .

get-your-custom-paper






The post How can the brain repair itself or restore lost function after TBI or other brain damage (focus on the concept of neuroplasticity)? appeared first on nursing term paper.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.