#NAME?
just 300 words due in 3 hours…I need quality work
just 300 words due in 3 hours…I need quality work
Please read: Discovering Psychology, Sixth Edition with DSM5 Update by Hockenbury Chapter 11&Read the article ”Torture at Yale: Experimental subjects, laboratory torment and the “rehabilitation†of Milgram’s “Obedience to Authority†(‘OBEDIENCE ARTICLE’ POSTED IN THE MODULE)
1.
ARTICLE QUESTION
Stanley Milgram’s obedience studies are some of the most controversial in the history of psychology. The results were shocking (no pun intended!), but they also prompted a heated debate about the ethics of subjecting participants to a potentially very upsetting research experience. After reading the article ”Torture at Yale: Experimental subjects, laboratory torment and the rehabilitation of Milgram’s Obedience to Authority†and the book chapter coverage about these experiments, tell us what you think. According to the article, Milgram’s practices were not as ethical as he claimed. Did you change your opinion about the validity of Milgram’s findings after reading the article? Do you think that his findings can be applied to draw conclusions about the Holocaust and other horrific events?
Is it ethical to torment and trick subjects into potentially obeying an authority figure in the name of science? Are the findings from these studies so valuable to our understanding of obedience (especially for the understanding of such events as the Abu Ghraib incident) that the ends justify the means? Have we gone so far in protecting research subjects from any harm that this protection prevents us from making important findings in psychology research?
2.
CONFORMITY
The book describes the common practice of conforming to group pressure. Can you identify a situation in which you or someone else went along with a group against your/their better judgment? Which of the factors mentioned in the book might have influenced you/them to conform?
LA 4-1: If cross-functional problems occurs in a vital, value-added process, which approach might work best to get to the cause(s): RCA or Cause & Effect? Be sure to explain your reasoning.
LA 4-2: For the process you have in mind for your Week 8 Assignment, explain at least 3 potential causes of waste – also known as non-value-added activity (NVA).
FYI: Lean thinkers believe that CNVAs (Customer NVAs) are activities for which a customer would not pay if it were on the invoice, for example: overhead costs, copies of orders, internal approvals. Some refer to these as BVAs (business value-added) – that is, they are CNVAs, but are essential to the business. That said, wasted time, uncorrected errors, or excess inventory are genuine NVAs in Lean World.
The double entry system of accounting has been in existence for over 500 years. We still use it because it provides a way to check our work for accuracy. Even the simplest accounting software programs use this system. Discuss the pros and cons of the double entry system, and share any experience you have working either in an accounting department or with accounting software.
Focus of the Final ProjectStudents will construct a well-diversified portfolio using an initial investment stake of $50,000 (the portfolio should use at least 95% of the initial investment, but they may not use more than $50,000). Students may include stocks, common or preferred; bonds, corporate or U.S. Treasury bonds; mutual funds, and futures contracts, or options. Students will use the closing prices from the first day of the class to determine the price of each issue. Only whole lots of any issues may be acquired; that is, no less than 100 shares of common or preferred stock, no less than five corporate bonds or $10,000 for U.S. Treasury Bonds, no fewer than the minimum required investment for any mutual fund, and no fewer than five contracts for any option or futures position. The settlement date will be the first day of Week Three. Students do not have to use all of the above mentioned securities, but they must use more than one class of security. Transaction costs are ignored in the creation of the portfolio.
The Final Project is to be written in accordance with APA guidelines as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Writing the Final ProjectThe Final Project:
Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Before we go too far, keep in mind that we are only developing a draft here. You and your Facilitator will be reviewing and developing this Literature Review over and over again – adding more and more elements until you are ready to turn in your final draft. According to my calculations, that means you have eight more weeks to develop this, since your final draft is not due until the end of your next course. So, do not get too stressed out. Yes, we have a lot of work to do, but you will have time to develop your skills.
Keep in mind that the purpose of your Literature Review is to merge the research you are doing and illustrate it in a unique way. This means it is more than just summarizing what you are reading, but helping your reader understand what is out there about the subject and help them interpret all that information.
To do that, you will need to choose a way to present your discoveries. While there is no specific requirement about how your information should be organized or structured, students commonly choose one of two ways: Chronological or Thematic. We have provided a brief description and example below to help you decide which approach might be best for you.
Chronological |
Thematic |
---|---|
This approach allows you to develop your literature review in the same way the topic has been developed through the literature. By choosing this layout you are simply illustrating how the topic has developed over time, presenting different research and describing how the topic has evolved. While some view this as an easier approach, it does make it more difficult to synthesize information or address a specific approach, since you are obligated to follow the progression of the topic. |
This approach allows the writer to synthesize information into discrete (distinct) concepts, perspectives, or structures. By choosing this layout you have the opportunity to develop specific topics and illustrate how information on your topic can be treated together. This approach has many advantages, however it does require the writer to integrate research and make assertions by integrating research. |
Example Chronological Outline
|
Example Thematic Outline
|
Okay – Did you chose an approach? Don’t worry, you can always switch, but time is an issue for us. So, the best advice we can give is just choose and approach and go with it. We can deal with revisions later, but we need to get started.
Okay – Ready? – Here we go!
While a graduate or professional literature review may cite more than 100 sources, let’s not get too crazy! While this is not a specific requirement, a good undergraduate literature review will reference approximately 20 sources. This is enough to provide a basic foundation through which to show your expertise. However, as you become more familiar with your topic and begin to see the sources others have cited, you may want to expand your review of the literature.
On the other hand, using limited sources means that you will need to be very picky about what sources you choose to include. You will want to be sure that the studies you are referencing clearly speak to your topic and provide good evidence to support your conclusions.
Using your approach (Chronological or Thematic) begin your review. It might help to use the following outline to help guide your review:
In the Resource Section there are some example papers you can reference. The Literature Reviews typically begin a few pages in. Your facilitator might also be able to provide further explanation or provide further resources.
By the end of this week, you will need to submit a draft of your Literature Review. At minimum, you should submit a working outline that clearly indicates the sections of the literature review, even if the writing related to some of these sections is undeveloped (meaning some of it should be developed). Your Facilitator should be able to determine that you have a firm grasp on the subject at large.
On Australia’s agriculture and land managemt
Multiple questions from 51-75
I need A in this assignment. No plagiarism, No grammar mistakes. Thank you
Case Study: Database Development
Read the following articles
Dual Assessment of Data Quality in Customer Databases, Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), Volume 1 Issue 3, December 2009, Adir Even, G. Shankaranarayanan.
Process-centered review of object oriented software development methodologies, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Volume 40 Issue 1, February 2008, Raman Ramsin, and Richard F. Paige.
Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: