OUTLINE the amount of words depends on you.

 O rganizations must be adaptable and responsive to changes in the environment to succeed. Within the organization, individuals and groups must learn to manage change and cross-functional sharing of resources and knowledge. Select an organization to research.

  Research and design an organizational assessment to enhance leadership skills, promote team innovation, and build a culture to support and mange change.

Discuss at least 3 change models, and analyze how they address the process of change in an organization.

Select a method for data collection, and discuss your rationale for the selection of this method.

Design a plan that addresses the need for goal setting that is horizontal and vertically aligned, and discusses the correlation between aligned goals and a collaborative work environment.

Apply diagnostic skills to the situation and develop a preliminary diagnosis on how to improve the organizational climate related to aligning goals.

Describe options for presenting feedback to the organization, and select the process that you would recommend for offering feedback on your diagnosis.

What resistance might you encounter in how your organization will recive the assessment?

Offer your recommendations for addressing the resistance to change.

An employee working in customer service at a large company arrives at her desk and finds a package from a customer she recently spoke with.  Inside is a gift card for $50 to an expensive restaurant to thank her for her assistance, which ultimately saved the customer money.  She remembers that the company has a code of conduct policy against accepting gifts from customers, but she thinks that it may only pertain to gifts of a larger amount.  Unsure what to do, she reaches out to a leader in the department for insight.

In your discussion post complete the following:

• Choose a stage from the Kohlberg Model and construct an email response from the business leader in response to this dilemma.  Make sure the response reflects the characteristics of the chosen stage from the Kohlberg model.
• After composing the email, predict how that leader’s approach to business ethics might impact the organizational culture.
• Describe how the leader’s decision and advice to you regarding this issue might change over time.

Hello folks,

I had paid 20$ to this work and the teacher dose not want to answer me to fix his worst work ever. I have no problem to say his name. He is Pros. I wrote it in order to everyone be away form such an trustbale teacher.

Here are the ponts that my professor wants me to fix my esaay:

I’ve read the 1st draft of your essay on the emergence of science fiction in the 1800s, and while I think it covers a fair amount of ground I also think it still needs some work in terms of conceptualization, organization and explanation. Please allow me to make the following comments:

1. Your introduction is good, though you repeat/overuse the “many authors” phrase. Still, nice and clear. Good.

2. Para #2 — not sure what you mean by “many people thought that civilization would have a negative impact for humankind”. Which people do you have in mind, and what aspects of civilization, and what negative impacts exactly? It’s all a bit vague. Also, the sudden jump to WWII is confusing — keep in mind your essay is dealing with the 1800s. Also, did dystopian stories really pre-date the 20th century in any great measure?

3. Para #3 — not sure why we’re going all the way back to the Greeks. OK, you can make this argument if you wish, but it doesn’t really relate to or add to your paper.

4. Para #4 — again, Bacon and the whole Scientific revolution predate the 1800s by a century or more, so this isn’t strictly on topic either. As to the “social and technological changes” of the 1800s, it would greatly strengthen your case if you were to specify a few of them!

5. Para #5 — once more, you need to offer some examples. Not sure what you mean by “hard fiction,” even though you do attempt to define it. The final three sentences don’t really make any sense — what are your trying to argue here?

6. Para #6 — you’re right on the impact of electricity on the imagination, byt then (once again) do not really develop thbis idea with any precision or illustrations. How did it, for example, “provide mankind with the ability to foresee things that did not happen since the very first day,” whatever those last 9 words actually refer to?? And again, which authors do you have in mind?

7. Para #7 — this is OK, but once more I’m not convinced it actually adds much to your argument in the absence of any specific examples.

8. Para #8 — some more confusion I’m afraid. How do scientific principles contradict the laws of nature? Do they not, in fact, throw light on the workings of nature that hitherto had been little understood? Did the scientific revolution really give people the ability of telepathy and mind control — where did you get this from?

9. The final two paragraphs (pp. 6-7) before the conclusion show some more promise, but again (!) with no specific details or examples (other than The Time Machine, which you unfortunately credit to H.G. Orwell rather than its author H.G. Wells). As a result, by the time we come to the end, I’m left with the overall impression that you may well be right much of the time, but really have provided no evidence or illustrations to show why. This is important.

This isn’t necessarily cause for panic or despair. As said, the basic structure and premise of your paper are OK; what’s missing is a more focused exploration of the topic at hand (leaving aside stuff that is not strictly relevant), at least a few concrete examples to demonstrate your case more convincingly, and rigorous documentation of your argument to back it up.

If you want to discuss any of this, I’d be happy to do so.

For now, 5/10 for the draft.

David