• Return to the data you had generated in the second part of the Week Two assignment. You should have total numbers of first-born boys and girls in your state between the years 2007 and 2012 separately by racial group: American Indians or Alaska Natives, Asian or Pacific Islanders, Black or African Americans, and Whites. For the first part of this discussion, construct and report the 95% confidence intervals for the proportions of first-born boys, separately for each racial group. (Use the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.) Comment on the confidence intervals: can you infer from the confidence intervals that the proportions of first-born boys differ among the racial groups? Explain what the widths of the confidence intervals tell you.

• Leading up to elections, you often hear results of polls of voters’ preferences, with statements such as: “This poll was taken from a random sample of 600 potential voters, and has an accuracy exceeding 96%.” Please interpret this statement in light of your knowledge of binomial confidence intervals. (Remember, the width of a confidence interval is a measure of the precision of the estimate.)

Linear Programming $25

In a command or planned economy, the government, not the market, regulates the factors of production and economic activities considered essential to the function of the economy.  Economic decisions including what goods and services to produce (supply), how resources are allocated and regulated and how profits are distributed are made and implemented by the government.

How is the U.S. economy different from a command economy? Can the U.S. economy be called a true free market economy? Explain your answer by discussing the ways in which the federal government interacts with and regulates the U.S. economy in the context of both a command and free market economy.

Identity paper (4 pages)

“Identity is a curious notion… coming to know ourselves involves not so much discovery as creativity, Minnich (2010). 

Tosha Tshang’s identity is a narrative about experiences of high performing sport – she also constructs her academic voice, stories of beauty and being a woman, and stories of racialization; in fact she is a multiplicity of stories through which she explores her identity:

1.    Using narrative what is your identity?

2.    In the final analysis – how does your identity inform your practice as a professional

Read the attached article closely and try to capture the narrative of your own identity using the post-structural perspective. In fact the minute you catch yourself using the word identity in your narrative/stories – you may be on the path of describing a “static” identity.

See below the guidethat helps you follow the argument about writing your identity using the post-structural perspective as Tosha Tsang. 

The lack of certainty and the contradictions pertaining to her identity are important features to embrace in our world today.  This guide tells you how and why.

Use this to guide you towards thinking and writing your own identity. Tosha Tsang writes her experiences using the post-structural perspective.  What does post-structural mean? 

Guide

First of all we begin with what structural perspective is  – a structural position frames phenomenon through an  unchanging, universal laws of human behavior and social phenomena while the post-structural position frames phenomenon as more nuanced, multileveled, and ultimately complicated framings of the world around us.

We are all human – men and women. Isn’t this a universal law? If that is the case – where does that leave the transgender people and or seeking sex change?  Post-structural position is that which may accommodate more nuanced, multilevel and more complicated framings of the world. So those who left this world (as more universal and with unchanging laws of human behavior) indeed when marriage meant a union between a man and a woman may be shocked today!

Most people think through a rational autonomous subject perspective when asked to speak about their identity.   What is a rational autonomous subject? It is obedience to the law one has prescribed to oneself –  a capacity for choice that is motivationally independent,  not determined by external influence.

When people say things such as … this happened to me so I decided to be… they are speaking from the rational autonomous subject perspective.  They are using their own reason to determine what they want to be and perhaps how the world should view them. The post-structural position views the rational autonomous subject as untenable or as unsustainable or a weak position.

There are so many things that people cannot determine for themselves against the predetermined social categories.  How do you determine how the world will view you as a woman? What should a Native Americans determine rationally in America? What about the black or the African Americans?  A more tenable identity position is to state what you desired and also disclose how the society/community members re-positioned you. In writing your identity – there is always the others. It is the interaction that finally carries the day. PLEASE REMEMBER THIS POINT AS YOU CONSIDER YOUR IDENTITY

The subject position of a rational autonomous subject is problematic – because meanings are unstable and the foundation of knowledge is also questionable. Whose meaning and whose perspective are you using to tell your stories?  What does it mean when a young girl says she can be whatever she chooses to be? Is her meaning universal? What about the blocks the society puts on her, what is her strategy?  This idea I can be what I choose to be is fairly subjective and it means different things to different people.  This what Tosha  means when she speaks about sense making stories – the stories she tells herself and others to explain the meaning of my experiences…

So identity

·      Sense of identity is destabilized in the face of multiple realities/meanings brought about by  (social media, instant ability to traverse diverse different communities and geographies through the internet and the TV, instant news from around the world). How is Tosha Tsang’s sense of identity destabilized?   Can you think of how social media has destabilized realities our there?

·      Ensuing and on-going struggle to come to terms with these realities – can she be an ambassador for Canada if she does not live up to the standards of groom for women?

·      Does one become HALF of what you were and HALF of what you become after exposure? A critical question

·      According to Bhabha – there is the third space where differences are negotiated and where the past and present transform each other, personally how do you deal with the post-structural realities? What certainties in your life have changed? What realities have remained the same? After reading the narratives what is the author’s third space? How does she deal with the realities and counter –realities in her narrative?

·      Third space – one discovers the gaps, contradictions, ambiguity, uncertainty, conflicts of feelings such as love and hate. If you examine the realities that we examined from Tosha’s narratives –name the gaps, contradictions, ambiguities, uncertainties and onflicts of feelings that you observed.

·      The identity that appears is Fragmented and contested because the world around the subject is neither certain or stable.

Looking at Tosha Tsang’s identity through the post-structural lenses