Nursing Critical Appraisal of research
Evaluation TableUse this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchFull citation of selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4Dubin, J (2018)Pediatric obesity in primary practice. Pediatric Nursing .44(4), 202-206.Hargreaves, m., Orfield, C., Honeycutt, T., Vine, M., Cabili, C., Coffee- Boden, B., Fisher, S. (2017). Addressing childhood obesity through multisector collaboration: Journal of community health, 42 (4) 656-663Kitson, S (2018). Intervention for weight in obesity to improve survival in women with endometrial cancer. Retrieved from https//www.waldenulibrary.orgRuopeng An, Mengmeng Ji, & Zhang. (2017). Effectiveness of social media intervention on weight related behavior and body weight status. American Journal of health behavior 41(6), 670-682Conceptual FrameworkDescribe the theoretical basis for the studyDesign/Method Describe the designand how the studywas carried outSample/SettingThe number andcharacteristics ofpatients,attrition rate, etc.Major Variables StudiedList and define dependent and independent variablesMeasurementIdentify primary statistics used to answer clinical questionsData AnalysisStatistical orqualitativefindingsFindings and RecommendationsGeneral findings and recommendations of the researchAppraisalDescribe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility ofuse in your practice?General Notes/CommentsLevels of Evidence TableUse this document to complete the levels of evidence table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchAuthor and year of selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4Study DesignTheoretical basis for the studySample/SettingThe number andcharacteristics ofpatientsEvidence Level *(I, II, or III)OutcomesGeneral Notes/Comments* Evidence Levels:Level IExperimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysisLevel IIQuasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysisLevel IIINonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesisLevel IVRespected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidenceLevel VLiterature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidenceOutcomes Synthesis TableUse this document to complete the outcomes synthesis table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of ResearchAuthor and year of selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4Sample/SettingThe number andcharacteristics ofpatientsOutcomesKey FindingsAppraisal and Study QualityGeneral Notes/Comments